Prediction of Jakob Hlasek vs Ken Flach Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Hlasek vs K. Flach

Jakob Hlasek

SUI

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Ken Flach

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Hlasek 1 - 0 Flach

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jakob Hlasek winning 2 and Ken Flach winning 0. The last match between Jakob Hlasek and Ken Flach was at the Tokyo Indoor, 21-10-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Jakob Hlasek getting the victory 7-5 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Hlasek	1
Flach	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Tokyo Indoor(10-21-85)

Stats

Jakob Hlasek

Ken Flach

J. Hlasek vs K. Flach H2H Profile

J. Hlasek	Stats	K. Flach
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
56.90% (429-325)	Career Total W/L	40.00% (56-84)
1	Indoor	0
6	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Hlasek vs K. Flach Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jakob Hlasek has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ken Flach has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jakob Hlasek, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ken Flach has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jakob Hlasek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ken Flach has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jakob Hlasek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ken Flach winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jakob Hlasek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 153/112), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 9/11). Ken Flach has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 17/17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/6).
Player level: In the last year, Jakob Hlasek has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ken Flach has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jakob Hlasek winning 1 times and Ken Flach being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jakob Hlasek winning 2 and Ken Flach winning 0.
The last match between Jakob Hlasek and Ken Flach was at the Tokyo Indoor, 21-10-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Jakob Hlasek getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jakob Hlasek has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ken Flach has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jakob Hlasek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ken Flach has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jakob Hlasek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ken Flach has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jakob Hlasek vs Ken Flach Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Hlasek vs K. Flach H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Hlasek	Stats	K. Flach
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	9
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Hlasek Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Grand Slam Cup - 02-12-1996
QF Boris BeckerB. Becker	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
R1 Cedric PiolineC. Pioline	W	2-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Moscow - 04-11-1996
R2 Goran IvanisevicG. Ivanisevic	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
R1 Tomas CarbonellT. Carbonell	W	7-6(6) 6-2	Stats
Lyon - 30-09-1996
R1 Michael StichM. Stich	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats

View All

K. Flach Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - 26-06-1995
R1 Jim CourierJ. Courier	L	7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 3-6 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 08-08-1994
R1 Nicklas KultiN. Kulti	W	2-6 7-6(2) 6-2	Stats
R2 Jim CourierJ. Courier	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Washington - 13-07-1992
R1 Peter LundgrenP. Lundgren	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Orlando - 01-04-1991
R1 Jeff TarangoJ. Tarango	L	7-6(5) 6-4	Stats

View All

J. Hlasek vs K. Flach Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Hlasek	Stats	K. Flach
56.90% (429/325)	YTD Win/Loss	40.00% (56/84)
54.67% (1072/889)	Sets Win/Loss	43.72% (174/224)
51.70% (9962/9308)	Games Win/Loss	47.43% (1848/2048)
57.74% (153/112)	Hard Win/Loss	41.33% (31/44)
55.00% (99/81)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/6)
58.51% (141/100)	Indoor Hard W/L	32.00% (8/17)
52.94% (36/32)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (17/17)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
260.88	Average Opponent Rank	273.51
53.33% (56/49)	Slam W/L	52.50% (21/19)
56.80% (71/54)	Masters W/L	37.50% (6/10)
70.83% (17/7)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
56.80% (263/200)	Main Tour W/L	32.89% (25/51)
58.33% (14/10)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (4/4)
57% (345/604)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	34% (33/96)
55% (81/146)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	52% (23/44)
49% (77/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (2/4)
57% (132/232)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (21/50)
87% (397/347)	1st Set Won, Won Match	73% (55/40)
12% (397/49)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	27% (55/15)
23% (355/80)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (85/16)